Wednesday, June 20, 2012

.
 Associated Press 19 hours ago

Microsoft tablet risks alienating PC makers

With the unveiling of the Surface tablet, Microsoft is heading into unusual territory: competing with its partners, the very same companies that make Windows PCs. But Microsoft has little to lose, since PC manufacturers have so far had very little success with their own tablets.
With the unveiling of its tablet this week Microsoft Corp. is taking up the competition with Apple Inc. and its iPad by borrowing a page from Apple's playbook. It is keeping both software and hardware development under the same roof.
"If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the compliments from Microsoft poured down like a torrential storm on Apple last night," said analyst Brian White at Topeka Capital Markets.
Even Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's famously tough-talking CEO sounded downright Zen and Apple-inspired as he introduced the Surface.
"We believe that any intersection between human and machine can be made better when all aspects of the experience — hardware and software — are considered and working together," he said at Monday's launch event in Los Angeles.
That's a new philosophy for Microsoft, a company accustomed to writing the software, charging loads of money for it, and letting others design the hardware. Microsoft has sold hardware before, most notably the Xbox game console, which is essentially a PC. But when it ventured into the game console market, it wasn't directly treading on the toes of the big PC makers who buy Windows from it. (The exception was Sony, which makes both PCs and PlayStation consoles.)
With Surface, Microsoft faces the challenge of selling the soon-to-be-launched Windows 8 to PC makers who want to make tablets, while at the same time selling tablets directly to consumers.
Rick Sherlund, an analyst at Nomura Securities said Microsoft's hardware partners "are no doubt unhappy" about the prospect of competing with Microsoft's tablets, particularly since Microsoft set a high bar with Surface.
Surface will come in two versions, both with screens measuring 10.6 inches diagonally, slightly larger than the iPad. One model will run on phone-style chips, just like the iPad, and will be sold for a similar price. Another, heavier and more expensive model, will run on Intel chips and be capable of running standard Windows applications.
Ballmer suggested that Microsoft is making hardware so it can kick-start Windows tablets and make sure they're competitive right from the get-go. But the company's long-term goals are unclear. Will Microsoft keep making tablets, or will it declare victory at some point and leave the field to its hardware partners?
One sign of limited long-term commitment to making its own tablets is that Microsoft will be selling the tablets only from its own stores and website. That might leave space for other manufacturers to sell Windows tablets through Best Buy and other electronics stores.
Google Inc. is in a similar position. It makes Android, the software that powers most iPad competitors. But it has also acquired Motorola Mobility, a company that makes Android tablets and phones, so now finds itself competing with hardware partners like Samsung and HTC.
But Google has made clear that it will treat Motorola as a separate, "arms-length" business, and that it made the acquisition to get hold of Motorola's patents, which will provide legal cover not just for Google, but for other manufacturers who make Android devices.
Microsoft's position is complicated by the possibility that consumers will favor its tablet over other Windows tablets for exactly the reasons Ballmer articulated: it's made by the same company that wrote the software. That puts an end to the old Windows PC support runaround, where PC makers blame Microsoft for product failures, and Microsoft blames the PC makers. If something's wrong with Surface, buyers will know who to call.
Ronan de Renesse, an analyst at Analysys Mason, said Microsoft can afford to alienate PC makers when it comes to tablets, because they've captured such a small share of the market. Samsung Electronics and AsusTek Computer Inc. are the only PC makers who have appreciable market share in tablets, and they only make up 10 percent or so, by his estimate. Other major competitors to the iPad are Amazon.com Inc.'s Kindle and Barnes & Noble Inc.'s Nook.
"Microsoft's move in creating its own tablet is the sign that PC manufacturers have lost the game," Renesse said. "The big question is, if Surface becomes as successful as the iPad, will Microsoft choose to stop licensing Windows on tablets?"
Microsoft's partners are mum. Hewlett-Packard Co. and Acer, both of which make PCs and tablets, had no comment on Microsoft's announcement. Samsung did not respond to requests for comment.
___
AP Business Writer Ryan Nakashima contributed to this report from Los Angele

Thursday, May 24, 2012

QR Code Marketing



Can your beer glass do this?
Welcome to the next phase in on-premises beer marketing. Either that, or it’s just a cool thing to look at when you’re hoisting a few.
Regardless, this glass, developed by ad agency BBDO in New York, is the most social beer glass we’ve seen. Activate that QR code and the glass checks you in to Foursquare, tweets about your pint and/or updates your Facebook status.
And in a nice branding twist, you have to use Guinness — or at least another very dark beer. If your beer is filled with an ordinary pilsner like Budweiser, you won’t be able to read the code.
Update: Since some commenters noted that the QR code in the picture doesn’t work, we asked a rep for BBDO to explain. He said that the promo took place last year and the site is no longer active.
[Via Adweek]

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Android/iPhone Brand Loyalty Lines Drawn

Study: iPhone users are the most loyal

When it comes to mobile loyalty, Apple’s iPhone is ahead of the competition.

According to Reuters , a study by research firm GfK showed 84 percent of iPhone users would stick to that brand. The study also said 60 percent of Google's Android users would stay with that type of phone.

More: RLS Group iPhone applications

Apple iPhone user loyalty
Apple Inc.



Thursday, April 14, 2011

Web Advertising Eclipsed Newspapers in 2010

Web advertising in the U.S. resumed double-digit growth in 2010, outpacing traditional media and surpassing newspaper ad revenue for the first time, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau.

In an annual report prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the industry group said total Web ad revenue in the U.S. rose 15% to $26 billion last year, rebounding from a 3% decline in 2009 caused by an economic recession. However, last year’s growth rate is roughly half the growth the Web was posting before the global financial crisis of 2008.

Nonetheless, the rebound will likely build confidence in the digital media business, as consumers embrace Web services like Facebook Inc. and Netflix Inc. with enthusiasm even while the media industry has struggled to forge solid business models from online content.

“Online advertising has reached a level of maturity comparable to other mediums that have been deemed as significant ad platforms,” said Sherrill Mane, a senior vice president at IAB. “The fact that it’s still able to post double-digit growth speaks to the power of the Internet at a time when the economy is still struggling.”

The IAB estimates that Internet-ad revenue in 2010 surpassed that of newspapers, which amounted to $22.8 billion, as well as $22.5 billion from cable TV networks, $17.6 billion from broadcast TV networks and $15.3 billion from radio.

Last year’s growth was led by a 24% gain in display advertising, like online banner ads and digital video ads, in a sign that major brands are growing more comfortable with the medium as a place to invest their marketing dollars. The trend bodes well for online content companies, like AOL Inc., that are betting on major brands shifting more of their spending to the web.

Search remained the largest online-ad revenue category in a testament to the continued dominance of Google Inc. Search accounted for 46% of online ad revenue in 2010, down from 47%. It grew by 12% for the year—roughly half the pace of display ads, which accounted for 38% of total revenue.

For the first time, the IAB’s report included mobile advertising—a market that many expect to grow as popular devices like Apple Inc.’s iPad and iPhone become more prevalent. It estimated mobile revenue in 2010 came in between $550 million and $650 million.

The retail industry continued to be the largest source of online advertising dollars, accounting for 21% of the business in 2010, or about $5.5 billion in spending. Telecom companies made up 13% of online spending, while financial services accounted for 12% and auto advertisers made up 11%.

John Suhler, founding partner with private equity and media forecasting firm Verohnis Suhler Stevenson, noted on a conference call that a gap still exists between the percentage of time consumers spend using digital media and the percentage of spending that marketers allocate to the web.

“Dollars always follow eyeballs,” said Mr. Suhler. “It’s just a matter of time before we see that happen

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Top 9 Smartphone Etiquette Blunders

Top 9 Smartphone Etiquette Blunders


Top 9 Smartphone Etiquette Blunders

We’ve all been in a meeting where the person across the room is busy Tweeting or Facebooking under the table. Or out to lunch with the person who so tethered to their smartphone that they place it on the table, right next to their fork, for the entirety of the meal. Meanwhile, you are getting antsy, wondering when your conversation will be trumped by the latest Rihanna ring tone.

Almost everyone has a smartphone these days. I was one of the holdouts until about two weeks ago, when I broke down and got the Verizon iPhone 4. I love it. But as a PDA late bloomer, I’ve spent the last two years becoming keenly aware of the loss of social etiquette when it comes to these devices. They don’t call them Crackberries for nothing.

So what are the 10 biggest smartphone etiquette blunders?

1. Multi-tasking

“Don’t multi-task and send text messages or read e-mails while you are in conversation with someone,” suggests Shelley Davis Mielock, chief image expert at Mieshel Image Consulting in Lansing, Michigan. “If you are sitting at a table with someone and you are sending a text message at the same time, it shows the person in front of you that they are not important to you. It also makes them feel rushed.”

2. Typing quickly

“Make sure to always use spell check,” advises Davis Mielock. “Every message you send is an extension of your personal and professional image. I know people type in ‘please excuse misspellings,’ but you should really be checking each and every time. Take that extra second and treat each correspondence as if you were sending a letter from your office.”

3. Turning on vibrate

“The vibration is a distraction—everyone can hear that,” says Rachel Wagner, a certified corporate etiquette consultant, trainer, and speaker in Tulsa, Oklahoma. “Keep your device on silent and put it in your pocket while you are in a meeting. If you are expecting an urgent call, excuse yourself and take the call in a private place.”

4. Participating in ‘lap reading’

“Everyone can see when you head is lowered and you are focusing on your smartphone,” Wagner says. “This causes you to look disengaged and prevents you from having eye contact. It is also really rude and gives a terrible impression.”

5. Leaving long-winded messages

This one goes for all phone users. “Don’t leave long, complicated voice messages where you speak so fast that it sends the other person scrambling for a pen to write it all down,” says Alison Blackman Dunham, co-founder of Advicesisters.net, a life and advice site. “The best thing to do is to just say, “Hi, I need to talk to you about so-and-so. Please call me back.’ Then leave your number and hang up…simple as that.”

6. Putting someone on an extended hold

“When you say you are putting someone on hold for just a moment, it should be for just a moment,” says Blackman Dunham. “Business people are busy. If you can’t talk to someone, tell them you will call them back and give them an exact time; it is the courteous thing to do.”

7. Having a ringback tone

“Ringback tones are not for professionals…unless you are a pop star,” says Davis Mielock. “If I am calling a banker to inquire about a mortgage loan and he has a rapper ringback tone, I will call his credibility into question.”

8. Talking in front of others

“Excuse yourself,” Davis Mielock suggests. “Don’t have conversations in front of other people at all, especially professional conversations. It is incredibly inconsiderate to the people around you.”

9. Interrupting face-to-face conversation

“I’ve known people to be in the middle of an in-person conversation and just start typing away on their smartphone,” says Wagner. “They don’t realize how that comes across. That behavior sends the message that the text is more important than the person standing in front of them and causes feelings of disengagement from your conversation partner.”